Testing mobile applications aim to create convenient, safe and reliable applications that were created according to the documentation. Testing mobile applications differ significantly from standardized approaches to testing applications on a PC, due to the specifics of work, features of mobile devices and a variety of platforms. Mobile application testing company experts have identified important tips that will be useful to both experienced testers and beginners. From qasupermarket.com you will know the best.
Use associative cards and heuristics or mnemonics to simplify the testing process, since it is difficult to remember all aspects of testing. Screenshots, logs and videos are the best arguments of the tester. Examine the application life cycle for a better understanding.
The application should work stably with:
- Unstable connection,
- Without connection,
- Low speed,
- Lack of server response,
- Incorrect server response,
- Changes in the form of a Wi-Fi connection.
If your application supports portrait and landscape mode – pay special attention to orientation changes. It can provoke memory leaks, cessation of work, and a return to the previous state. If the services are provided by an independent party, there will be a failure. It is necessary to think over all situations and have a workaround.
Ask the developers to get rid of the functions in the menu, without which life will become easier. Do not neglect testing on emulators or simulators this is a great solution. Do not forget to check the data transfer when upgrading the version. Users can ignore the versions, and you will need to check for updates from 1.0 to 1.5.
You will need a usage analysis system and a bug report.
Over the last year of the work of the Android development team at Buffer, we talked a lot about the cleanliness of our project and improving its stability. One of the factors was the introduction of tests, which, as we have already found out, help us avoid regressions in our code and give us great confidence in the features we provide. And now, when we launch new products in Buffer, we want to make sure that the same approach is applied when it comes to them just so that we are not in the same situation as before.
Techniques of time management and various systems of accounting for daily tasks interested me from the first days of work in the office. Eisenhower’s matrix became salvation from the quagmire of routine affairs, and at first, it saved from the inefficient use of working time. But, after several months, the number of tasks increased so much that the quadrant technique showed its weaknesses. In order to better consider them, we recall the principle of constructing the Eisenhower Matrix. Two axes: urgency and importance, and 4 quadrants, respectively:
- Urgent and important
- Urgent and not important
- Not urgent and important
- Not urgent and not important
It is assumed that the person himself will evaluate his tasks according to the criteria of urgency and importance, and then put the results in the appropriate quadrants.
A simple instruction:
Urgent and important tasks are carried out independently and immediately, urgent and not important are delegated to someone. Not urgent, but important tasks can be postponed, but you can certainly do it yourself, but not urgent and not important tasks are generally equated to a meaningless load they are recommended to either be postponed indefinitely or mercilessly delegated, in general not give them any significant value for the work process.